Internal vs. Expert Triage: Why the Vulnerability Management Method You Pick Matters
hackerone.com | blog | #bug-bounty | #vulnerability-management | #remediation | #vdp | #false-positives | #cvss | #vulnerability-triage | #cisos
Summary
HackerOne sees 60-80% of submissions invalid and SANS reports 73% cite false positives. The article frames triage as a production process and weighs in-house vs expert triage tradeoffs.
- Published
- Collected
--- id: 1138 title: "Internal vs. Expert Triage: Why the Vulnerability Management Method You Pick Matters" source_domain: hackerone.com source_url: "https://www.hackerone.com/blog/internal-vs-expert-triage-vulnerability-management" published_at: "2026-02-12 20:40" tags: ["bug-bounty", "vulnerability-management", "remediation", "vdp", "false-positives", "cvss", "vulnerability-triage", "cisos"] phying_url: "https://phying.com/item/1138" lang: en --- # Internal vs. Expert Triage: Why the Vulnerability Management Method You Pick Matters ## Summary HackerOne sees 60-80% of submissions invalid and SANS reports 73% cite false positives. The article frames triage as a production process and weighs in-house vs expert triage tradeoffs. ## Intelligence Metadata - **Sources:** hackerone.com - **Published:** 2026-02-12 20:40 - **Original:** https://www.hackerone.com/blog/internal-vs-expert-triage-vulnerability-management - **Phying News:** https://phying.com/item/1138