PPhying中文
Curated security research, vulnerabilities, advisories and tools for practitioners.

Measure, Compare, and Enhance Security Programs with HackerOne Benchmarks

hackerone.com | blog | #bug-bounty | #vulnerability-management | #security-program | #security-metrics | #hackerone | #benchmarking
📄 Raw .md⬇️ Download .md🔗 Original ↗

Summary

HackerOne Benchmarks lets security teams compare response, triage, and bounty metrics against industry peers using data from 3,500+ programs, with year-over-year trends to spot weaknesses.
Published
Collected

Related coverage

blog · netspi.com
Metrics: Your Security Yardstick – Part 2 – Defining Metrics
Follow-up on building security metrics: map controls to requirements, pull data from reliable sources like vulnerability management tools, then combine low-level metrics into higher-level indicators.
blog · netspi.com
Enterprise Vulnerability Management
NetSPI presented at Secure360 on formalizing enterprise vulnerability management, arguing few organizations manage vulnerabilities, and released a white paper outlining a four-phase approach.
blog · netspi.com
Metrics: Your Information Security Yardstick
Security metrics fall into effort, result, and environment types—from training hours to days since the last breach. Tracking them proves program value and helps justify budgets to leadership.
blog · hackerone.com
Measuring The Fix: How We Evaluate Frontier Models on Remediation Quality
HackerOne tested frontier models on security fix quality and found the judge mattered more than the model. See how CTEM remediation earns engineer trust.
blog · hackerone.com
Critical PHP Vulnerabilities: What Security Teams Need to Know
Learn about the critical PHP vulnerabilities, HackerOne’s response, and the rise in reports. Review patching guidance and coordinated disclosure practices.
blog · hackerone.com
Project Glasswing: What We Learned Running a Frontier Model on Our Own Codebase
HackerOne ran Anthropic's Mythos 5 model against its own production code; it surfaced a critical RCE spanning three safe-in-isolation commits, illustrating compositional risk that diff review misses.
Back