PPhying中文
Curated security research, vulnerabilities, advisories and tools for practitioners.

AI Comprehension Gaps: When Humans and AI See Different Things

josephthacker.com | blog | #ai-security | #ai-safety | #llm | #human-ai-interaction | #comprehension-gap | #security-concepts
📄 Raw .md⬇️ Download .md🔗 Original ↗

Summary

Joseph Thacker introduces 'AI Comprehension Gaps': mismatches between what users see or know and what an AI model understands from the same context, and the security risks they create.
Published
Collected

Related coverage

blog · blog.trailofbits.com
VMs won't contain cyber-capable agents
This technical commentary challenges prevailing assumptions about virtualization boundaries when hosting autonomous cyber AI models.
blog · blog.trailofbits.com
Trail of Bits’s Response to NTIA AI Accountability RFC
Trail of Bits responds to the NTIA AI Accountability Policy RFC, arguing AI audits need defined context, verifiable claims, and democratically set risk thresholds rather than narrow benchmarks.
blog · xbow.com
How Attackers Are Using AI & What Defenders Must Do
Attackers are running AI driven attack chains from recon to exploitation in minutes. Here’s what actually changed, and why defenders need AI pentesting to keep pace.
blog · projectblack.io
Bypassing EDR with Local AI
A pentest shows Claude refuses to build an LSASS dumper, but local DeepSeek and uncensored Qwen models produce a working XOR-encrypted minidumper, making AI-assisted EDR evasion nearly effortless.
blog · xbow.com
Engineering the Impossible: Adding Safety to Autonomous Agents
See how XBOW uses hard scoping, egress controls, Guardian Models, health monitoring, and audit trails to safely contain autonomous security agents.
blog · xbow.com
Grok 4.5 Is Powerful. The System Around It Makes It Safe.
XBOW tests Grok 4.5 in its autonomous offensive-security platform: the model often hits safety guardrails but accepts correction and replans, making it a controllable component, not safe alone.
Back