PPhying中文
Curated security research, vulnerabilities, advisories and tools for practitioners.

AI Hacking Agents Will Outperform Humans

josephthacker.com | blog | #ai-security | #bug-bounty | #pentesting | #automation | #offensive-security | #llm | #hacking-agents
📄 Raw .md⬇️ Download .md🔗 Original ↗

Summary

Joseph Thacker argues AI hacking agents will outperform humans: most bugs require methodology more than creativity, agents scale with near-infinite compute, and models keep improving fast.
Published
Collected

Related coverage

blog · hackenproof.com
How We Built an Autonomous AI Security Triager: From LLM to 20,000+ Real Reports
AI made bug hunters sharper, and report volume doubled. How HackenProof built an autonomous AI triager that now handles 70% of submissions.
blog · xbow.com
Grok 4.7 Is Different. So Is the Best Way to Use It.
XBOW tested Grok 4.7 on exploit crafting and agentic pentests: inside xAI's Build it improved substantially over 4.6, outside Build it slipped slightly—orchestration now matters as much as prompts.
blog · aikido.dev
Aikido launches external network pentesting
TL;DR: Aikido now pentests your external network. Attackers already test your perimeter every day, and with AI agents doing the grunt work, they're faster than ever. Now you can run the same test first. Give our agents one domain and they'll map the internet-facing systems you run and attack them from the outside, exactly like a malicious actor would.
blog · aikido.dev
Adding Aikido AI pentesting to your existing security stack
How to add Aikido's AI pentesting on top of the SAST, SCA and cloud tools you already run, from your first pentest through whitebox testing, continuous testing and remediation.
blog · specterops.io
AI for Offensive Security: What Works, What Does Not, and How to Adopt It
SpecterOps maps where AI helps offensive security (recon, tooling, vuln discovery) and where it still fails, stressing that results hinge on the harness: context, tools, state, independent validation, and human judgment.
blog · projectzero.google
Project Naptime: Evaluating Offensive Security Capabilities of Large Language Models
Project Naptime evaluates the offensive security capabilities of large language models, presenting a methodology, tooling setup, and early successes finding real vulnerabilities.
Back