Bad Vibes: Comparing the Secure Coding Capabilities of Popular Coding Agents
tenzai.com | blog | #ai-security | #appsec | #benchmark | #secure-coding | #ai-agents | #llm | #vibe-coding | #vulnerabilities | #ssrf | #vulnerability-analysis | #code-generation | #ai-coding-agents
Summary
A Tenzai benchmark had five AI coding agents—Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, Replit, Devin—build 15 identical apps, uncovering 69 vulnerabilities including broken auth and SSRF.
- Published
- Collected
--- id: 1908 title: "Bad Vibes: Comparing the Secure Coding Capabilities of Popular Coding Agents" source_domain: tenzai.com source_url: "https://www.tenzai.com/blog/bad-vibes-comparing-the-secure-coding-capabilities-of-popular-coding-agents" published_at: "2026-06-25 00:00" tags: ["ai-security", "appsec", "benchmark", "secure-coding", "ai-agents", "llm", "vibe-coding", "vulnerabilities", "ssrf", "vulnerability-analysis", "code-generation", "ai-coding-agents"] phying_url: "https://phying.com/item/1908" lang: en --- # Bad Vibes: Comparing the Secure Coding Capabilities of Popular Coding Agents ## Summary A Tenzai benchmark had five AI coding agents—Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, Replit, Devin—build 15 identical apps, uncovering 69 vulnerabilities including broken auth and SSRF. ## Intelligence Metadata - **Sources:** tenzai.com - **Published:** 2026-06-25 00:00 - **Original:** https://www.tenzai.com/blog/bad-vibes-comparing-the-secure-coding-capabilities-of-popular-coding-agents - **Phying News:** https://phying.com/item/1908