How We Fared in the Cyber Grand Challenge
blog.trailofbits.com | blog | #automation | #vulnerability-discovery | #patching | #competition | #darpa | #automated-patching | #automated-exploitation | #mcsema | #cyber-grand-challenge | #crs | #cgc
Summary
Trail of Bits' Cyber Reasoning System found bugs in 65 of 131 CGC qualifier programs and rewrote 94, but a fatal patching-performance flaw dropped it to 9th place, missing the finals cutoff.
- Published
- Collected
--- id: 2406 title: "How We Fared in the Cyber Grand Challenge" source_domain: blog.trailofbits.com source_url: "https://blog.trailofbits.com/2015/07/15/how-we-fared-in-the-cyber-grand-challenge/" published_at: "2015-07-15T11:00:09Z" tags: ["automation", "vulnerability-discovery", "patching", "competition", "darpa", "automated-patching", "automated-exploitation", "mcsema", "cyber-grand-challenge", "crs", "cgc"] phying_url: "https://phying.com/item/2406" lang: en --- # How We Fared in the Cyber Grand Challenge ## Summary Trail of Bits' Cyber Reasoning System found bugs in 65 of 131 CGC qualifier programs and rewrote 94, but a fatal patching-performance flaw dropped it to 9th place, missing the finals cutoff. ## Intelligence Metadata - **Sources:** blog.trailofbits.com - **Published:** 2015-07-15T11:00:09Z - **Original:** https://blog.trailofbits.com/2015/07/15/how-we-fared-in-the-cyber-grand-challenge/ - **Phying News:** https://phying.com/item/2406