PPhying中文
Curated security research, vulnerabilities, advisories and tools for practitioners.

SAST vs DAST: What You Need to Know in 2026

aikido.dev | blog | #authentication | #sast | #vulnerability-scanning | #security-testing | #dast | #sdlc
📄 Raw .md⬇️ Download .md🔗 Original ↗

Summary

SAST reads code from the inside before deployment; DAST probes the running app like an attacker. The article compares strengths, limits, and stages for each, including authenticated DAST.
Published
Collected

Related coverage

blog · borghq.io
What Is Code-Aware Application Security Testing?
This coverage gives security teams current context for monitoring, validation, and remediation.
blog · about.gitlab.com
When to use SAST versus an LLM security scanner
AI-based review and SAST catch different classes of bugs and both have benefits. Here's how to decide which one runs where, and when your team needs both.
blog · bugcrowd.com
Does agentic pen testing replace vulnerability scanning?
Bugcrowd on why agentic pen testing doesn't replace scanning: scanners flag what might be wrong, agentic testing proves what is exploitable, and layering both closes coverage gaps.
blog · borghq.io
Autonomous Pentesting vs Vulnerability Scanning: What Each Finds
This coverage gives security teams current context for monitoring, validation, and remediation.
blog · borghq.io
SAST and Business Logic Vulnerabilities: What Static Analysis Can Reach
This coverage gives security teams current context for monitoring, validation, and remediation.
blog · bugbunny.ai
SAST and DAST: How to Combine Static and Dynamic Testing
SAST analyzes code before it runs; DAST tests a deployed app by sending requests. Neither sees authorization or business logic, so pair both with manual validation and unified triage.
Back