PPhying中文
Curated security research, vulnerabilities, advisories and tools for practitioners.

Challenge Your Testing Fears With the Help of Code Review

hackerone.com | blog | #code-review | #guest-post | #testing | #software-development | #pullrequest | #unit-tests
📄 Raw .md⬇️ Download .md🔗 Original ↗

Summary

Andrew Tate's fourth guest post: Stack Overflow's 2019 survey shows over a third of developers don't test their code, and he uses PullRequest code review to build his first automated test suite.
Published
Collected

Related coverage

blog · hackerone.com
3 Lessons Learned from My First Week of Code Review
A writer-turned-developer at Animalz shares lessons from his first week of PullRequest code review: handle the sad paths, not just the happy path, and treat review as collaborative learning.
blog · hackerone.com
Common Best Practices for Cutting Build Times
Practical ways to cut build times: fail builds fast, fix flaky tests, optimize hotspots surfaced by coverage data, run only relevant tests, and prune low-value test cases.
blog · hackerone.com
Unit Testing in Go
A beginner's guide to unit testing in Go, covering the built-in test runner, go test commands, _test.go file conventions, Test function signatures, and how Go's approach differs from other languages.
blog · hackerone.com
Solving Problems Collaboratively Through Code Review
Andrew Tate's third guest post: treating code review as dialogue-asking reviewers for guidance instead of struggling alone with Stack Overflow-speeds up fixes and builds lasting intuition.
blog · hackerone.com
Learning security one code review at a time
Andrew Tate's second guest post: external code review helps solo developers handle their biggest unknown-security-by catching vulnerabilities that happy-path testing misses.
blog · hackerone.com
4 Benefits of Outsourcing Your Code Review
Outsourced code review offers an unbiased second pair of eyes, scales to your schedule, spares junior developers harsh internal critiques, and brings enterprise-level standards to small startups.
Back