You’re Pen Testing AI Wrong: Why Prompt Engineering Isn’t Enough
bishopfox.com | blog | #ai-security | #prompt-injection | #red-team | #llm-security | #penetration-testing | #application-security
Summary
Static prompt checks miss real LLM risks, Bishop Fox argues: models interpret intent, not rules, so testing must be scenario-driven and adversarial — a prompt that flips a safety policy shows why.
- Published
- Collected
--- id: 3873 title: "You’re Pen Testing AI Wrong: Why Prompt Engineering Isn’t Enough" source_domain: bishopfox.com source_url: "https://bishopfox.com/blog/youre-pen-testing-ai-wrong-why-prompt-engineering-isnt-enough" published_at: "2025-07-09 00:00" tags: ["ai-security", "prompt-injection", "red-team", "llm-security", "penetration-testing", "application-security"] phying_url: "https://phying.com/item/3873" lang: en --- # You’re Pen Testing AI Wrong: Why Prompt Engineering Isn’t Enough ## Summary Static prompt checks miss real LLM risks, Bishop Fox argues: models interpret intent, not rules, so testing must be scenario-driven and adversarial — a prompt that flips a safety policy shows why. ## Intelligence Metadata - **Sources:** bishopfox.com - **Published:** 2025-07-09 00:00 - **Original:** https://bishopfox.com/blog/youre-pen-testing-ai-wrong-why-prompt-engineering-isnt-enough - **Phying News:** https://phying.com/item/3873