Application Pen Testing: Point-In-Time vs Ongoing Approaches Explained
bishopfox.com | blog | #appsec | #continuous-testing | #web-security | #penetration-testing | #security-testing | #application-security
Summary
Bishop Fox compares point-in-time vs ongoing app pentesting: with 56% of major incidents tied to web apps, the choice depends on goals and resources — and attacker-mindset testing beats scanners.
- Published
- Collected
--- id: 3901 title: "Application Pen Testing: Point-In-Time vs Ongoing Approaches Explained" source_domain: bishopfox.com source_url: "https://bishopfox.com/blog/app-pen-testing-point-in-time-vs-ongoing" published_at: "2024-11-07 00:00" tags: ["appsec", "continuous-testing", "web-security", "penetration-testing", "security-testing", "application-security"] phying_url: "https://phying.com/item/3901" lang: en --- # Application Pen Testing: Point-In-Time vs Ongoing Approaches Explained ## Summary Bishop Fox compares point-in-time vs ongoing app pentesting: with 56% of major incidents tied to web apps, the choice depends on goals and resources — and attacker-mindset testing beats scanners. ## Intelligence Metadata - **Sources:** bishopfox.com - **Published:** 2024-11-07 00:00 - **Original:** https://bishopfox.com/blog/app-pen-testing-point-in-time-vs-ongoing - **Phying News:** https://phying.com/item/3901