PPhying中文
Curated security research, vulnerabilities, advisories and tools for practitioners.

Invest in Trusted Partners, Not Crowdsourcing, for Continuous Security

bishopfox.com | blog | #bug-bounty | #attack-surface | #security-testing | #crowdsourcing | #security-assurance | #managed-security
📄 Raw .md⬇️ Download .md🔗 Original ↗

Summary

Joe Sechman examines the limits of crowdsourcing for repeatable security testing and explains why the model should be inverted: technology as the crowd, expert operators driving analysis.
Published
Collected

Related coverage

blog · bishopfox.com
Applying Elite Military Training to Civilian Assessments
Brianne Hughes profiles Bishop Fox's military-trained operators, showing how elite offensive cyber training — from consequence analysis to discipline — elevates managed security assessments.
blog · bishopfox.com
How Bishop Fox Enables Wickr's Security Assurance
A customer case study: Bishop Fox provides Wickr with crypto architecture reviews, penetration testing, source code review, and quarterly assessments backing its public Customer Security Promises.
blog · xbow.com
Introducing Autonomous Exposure Management: Offensive Security at Enterprise Scale
XBOW tests your whole external application estate the way an attacker would, with no source code and no credentials, and proves what is exploitable.
blog · xbow.com
Continuous Attack Surface Testing vs Penetration Testing: Key Differences
This coverage helps security leaders evaluate continuous testing models against traditional point-in-time penetration tests.
blog · xbow.com
BAS vs Red Team vs Pentesting: How to Choose the Right Security Test
BAS, red teaming, and AI pentesting answer different questions. Learn when to use each and how AI pentesting validates exploitable app risk.
blog · bugcrowd.com
Does agentic pen testing replace vulnerability scanning?
Bugcrowd on why agentic pen testing doesn't replace scanning: scanners flag what might be wrong, agentic testing proves what is exploitable, and layering both closes coverage gaps.
Back