Phying News
P非影 中文
Curated security research, vulnerabilities, advisories and tools for practitioners.

[CVE-2026-22588] Tales From the Trace: How XBOW Reasons Its Way Into Finding IDORs

xbow.com | blog | CVE-2026-22588 | #agentic-ai | #appsec | #vulnerability-research | #idor | #cve | #ai-pentesting | #authorization | #spree

Summary

Walks through XBOW traces that found two IDORs in the Spree e-commerce framework (CVE-2026-22588/22589, patched in v5.2.5) by reasoning about objects and authorization states.
Published
Collected

original ↗

Related coverage

  1. How to Run an AI Application Pentesting Vendor RFP: The Evaluation Framework that actually works (xbow.com)
  2. Legal Boundaries of AI Penetration Testing: Engagements, Laws & Permissions (xbow.com)
  3. Getting to “Should I?”, Instead of “Can I?”: How XBOW Finds IDORs With High Accuracy in Ambiguous Contexts (xbow.com)
  4. The Most Overlooked Server Permission Checks (hackerone.com)
  5. How-To: Find IDOR (Insecure Direct Object Reference) Vulnerabilities for Large Bounty Rewards (bugcrowd.com)
  6. AI Application Security Testing: The Authorisation Boundary (borghq.io)

back