SAST and DAST: How to Combine Static and Dynamic Testing

This coverage gives security teams current context for monitoring, validation, and remediation.

NetSPI examines why development and application security teams clash over deadlines and findings, offering five steps to make security testing participation easier and less adversarial for developers.

NetSPI lists five signs of an overly manual application security assessment process, from email scoping to copy-paste reporting, arguing automation can cut administrative overhead by 40-60%.

Part 2 of the vibe coding benchmark dissects three AI-built apps (healthcare, banking, insurance), detailing what Neo caught, what Claude Code got wrong, and what both missed on AI-generated code.

DAST versus penetration testing: scanning gives repeatable baseline coverage, human testers validate exploit chains, business logic and impact—so use both and turn manual findings into regressions.

This coverage helps security leaders evaluate continuous testing models against traditional point-in-time penetration tests.