---
id: 7834
title: "5 Criteria for Evaluating External Attack Surface Management Vendors"
source_domain: netspi.com
source_url: "https://www.netspi.com/blog/executive-blog/attack-surface-management/criteria-for-evaluating-external-attack-surface-management-vendors/"
published_at: "2024-01-30T00:00:00Z"
tags: ["asm", "gartner", "easm", "procurement", "forrester", "vendor-evaluation"]
phying_url: "https://phying.com/item/7834"
lang: en
---

# 5 Criteria for Evaluating External Attack Surface Management Vendors

## Summary

NetSPI outlines five criteria for evaluating EASM vendors, starting with proven reputation and third-party validation from analysts like Gartner and Forrester, to align with your security goals.

## Intelligence Metadata

- **Sources:** netspi.com
- **Published:** 2024-01-30T00:00:00Z
- **Original:** https://www.netspi.com/blog/executive-blog/attack-surface-management/criteria-for-evaluating-external-attack-surface-management-vendors/
- **Phying News:** https://phying.com/item/7834
