Skip to content
Three Threat Modeling Automation Conjectures
Summary
If you are buying or building threat modeling automation, here are three conjectures to take into consideration.
- Published
- Collected
Related coverage
blog ·
netspi.com
How to Build a Layered Approach to Application Security Testing
Learn best practices from top AppSec experts to help you build a world-class, layered application security testing program.
blog ·
netspi.com
Mobile Application Threat Modeling
Mobile platforms carry users' most intimate data, yet security is often an afterthought. NetSPI offers a threat modeling framework to evaluate mobile apps at design time or retroactively.
blog ·
netspi.com
Shift Left Security: Integrating Pentesting Early in Development
This article explains how penetration testing fits into shift left security: integrating testing and automation early in the SDLC catches vulnerabilities before they become costly problems.
blog ·
netspi.com
Addressing Application Security Challenges in the SDLC
Podcast talk on shift-left application security: moving tests earlier saves time and money but strains teams, and contextual pentesting with better asset prioritization eases AppSec friction.
blog ·
netspi.com
A Checklist for Application Security Program Maturity
A phased checklist for building AppSec maturity: keep practices current with SDLC and DevOps changes, benchmark against industry data, and use roadmaps to prioritize remediation.
blog ·
netspi.com
Build Strong Relationships Between Development and Application Security Teams to Find and Fix Vulnerabilities Faster
Bridging the DevSecOps divide: with 71% of AppSec pros citing developers who skip early security work, the post urges empathy and shared incentives between development and security teams.