Security Orchestration vs. Automation: What's the Difference?

The best vulnerability management programs pair pentesting creativity with consistent, systematic processes, using automation for repetitive work and turning findings into reusable checklist items.

NetSPI lists five signs of an overly manual application security assessment process, from email scoping to copy-paste reporting, arguing automation can cut administrative overhead by 40-60%.

NetSPI explains how multiple scanners and ticketing systems create data silos that breed duplicate vulnerabilities and false positives, slowing remediation and eroding trust in security testing.

NetSPI announces Resolve 7, evolving its pentesting platform into a web-based vulnerability management and orchestration service with RBAC, SSO, findings correlation, and automated reporting.

NetSPI offers three best practices for making third-party pentest data compatible with security orchestration, since static PDF reports and custom formats hinder automated correlation and remediation.

NetSPI compares Excel, SharePoint, JIRA, ServiceNow, and home-built systems for tracking vulnerability remediation, outlining orchestration best practices that keep findings moving toward fixes.