PPhying中文
Curated security research, vulnerabilities, advisories and tools for practitioners.

How to Improve Code Quality: Tips for Cleaner Code

aikido.dev | blog | #ai-security | #code-review | #secure-coding | #best-practices | #reliability | #security | #code-quality | #maintainability | #readability | #ai-code-review | #ai-review
📄 Raw .md⬇️ Download .md🔗 Original ↗

Summary

Code quality rests on five pillars—readability, performance, maintainability, reliability, and security—supported by practical steps from clean structure to AI-assisted review.
Published
Collected

Related coverage

blog · aikido.dev
How to maintain code quality standards with AI code and vibe coding
As AI-written code piles up faster than review can absorb, technical debt compounds until shipping slows; the piece covers pull-request quality checks and why model self-review is not enough.
blog · aikido.dev
Code Quality: What Is It and Why It Matters
Code quality goes beyond clean syntax: readable, maintainable, testable, secure code stops defects snowballing into breaches. The article defines the key traits and how to measure them.
blog · hackerone.com
Unraveling Cyclomatic Complexity: A Guide to Simplifying Your Code
Explains cyclomatic complexity, McCabe's 1976 metric counting linearly independent paths through code, how high scores hurt testability and maintainability, and how to simplify tangled functions.
blog · borghq.io
Security Review for AI-Generated Code: What Changes Before Merge
More of every pull request is machine-drafted and the bug classes have not changed. What security review must catch in the diff before merge, and what it cannot.
blog · netspi.com
The Way Back Machine – Microsoft Word for Windows 1.1a
After Microsoft open-sourced Word for Windows 1.1a, a CheckMarx scan of the 1980s C++ codebase surfaced strcpy-style unsafe functions and 123 gotos—showing how far secure coding has come.
blog · netspi.com
Performing Code Reviews to PCI Requirements
A NetSPI post maps PCI requirements to the OWASP Top 10 for code reviews, noting gaps like track-data retention rules that OWASP does not cover, since no single PCI code-review checklist exists.
Back