PPhying中文
Curated security research, vulnerabilities, advisories and tools for practitioners.

Reducing Cybersecurity Debt with AI Autotriage

aikido.dev | blog | #ai-security | #vulnerability-management | #sast | #aikido | #false-positives | #nosql-injection | #ai-triage | #alert-fatigue | #autofix | #autotriage
📄 Raw .md⬇️ Download .md🔗 Original ↗

Summary

Security tools crying wolf cause alert fatigue. Aikido's AutoTriage uses AI to confirm true-positive SAST findings, prioritize exploitable issues like NoSQL injection, and filter out false positives.
Published
Collected

Related coverage

blog · aikido.dev
Aikido launches external network pentesting
TL;DR: Aikido now pentests your external network. Attackers already test your perimeter every day, and with AI agents doing the grunt work, they're faster than ever. Now you can run the same test first. Give our agents one domain and they'll map the internet-facing systems you run and attack them from the outside, exactly like a malicious actor would.
blog · aikido.dev
Adding Aikido AI pentesting to your existing security stack
How to add Aikido's AI pentesting on top of the SAST, SCA and cloud tools you already run, from your first pentest through whitebox testing, continuous testing and remediation.
blog · aikido.dev
The Cure For Security Alert Fatigue Syndrome
Aikido explains how it cures alert fatigue by filtering noise: dev-only dependencies, unfixable CVEs, unreachable code, and expired secrets are suppressed so teams see only actionable alerts.
blog · about.gitlab.com
When your backlog outgrows your team, GitLab scales remediation
This coverage gives security teams current context for monitoring, validation, and remediation.
vulnerability · projectdiscovery.io
From Detection to Validation: Fixing Broken Vulnerability Workflows
Version scanning lies by omission: only ~6% of CVEs are exploited. Nuclei validates exploitability at runtime with matchers, extractors, and multi-step flows, as the 2025 CrushFTP cases illustrate.
vulnerability · projectdiscovery.io
The Coverage Lie: Why Current Vulnerability Scanners Fail to Stop Breaches
Legacy scanners fail from untrusted version-based guesses, not coverage gaps: only ~6% of CVEs are exploited, yet weaponization is fast. Runtime validation plus KEV focus yields actionable results.
Back