Comparing web application scanners, part 2
portswigger.net | tool | #burp-suite | #benchmark | #scanner-comparison | #web-scanners | #vulnerability-detection | #ucsb
Summary
A UCSB evaluation of eleven web scanners scores Burp joint second at $191, far below commercial rivals, and concludes whole vulnerability classes like access controls and logic flaws evade scanners.
- Published
- Collected
--- id: 460 title: "Comparing web application scanners, part 2" source_domain: portswigger.net source_url: "https://portswigger.net/blog/comparing-web-application-scanners-part-2" published_at: "2010-06-28T09:52:00Z" tags: ["burp-suite", "benchmark", "scanner-comparison", "web-scanners", "vulnerability-detection", "ucsb"] phying_url: "https://phying.com/item/460" lang: en --- # Comparing web application scanners, part 2 ## Summary A UCSB evaluation of eleven web scanners scores Burp joint second at $191, far below commercial rivals, and concludes whole vulnerability classes like access controls and logic flaws evade scanners. ## Intelligence Metadata - **Sources:** portswigger.net - **Published:** 2010-06-28T09:52:00Z - **Original:** https://portswigger.net/blog/comparing-web-application-scanners-part-2 - **Phying News:** https://phying.com/item/460