Phying News
P非影 中文
Curated security research, vulnerabilities, advisories and tools for practitioners.

Automating Code Review Without Training Developers to Ignore It

bugbunny.ai | blog | #appsec | #automation | #code-review | #developer-security | #developer-experience | #pull-requests | #security-checks

Summary

Automating code review without training developers to ignore it: start with narrow, trusted checks like secrets and risky dependency changes, scope comments to diffs, and tune rules from dismissals.
Published
Collected

original ↗

Related coverage

blog · bugbunny.ai
Automated Code Review: What to Trust, What to Verify, and What to Keep Human
What to trust, verify or keep human in automated code review: automate repeatable diff-aware checks with repo context, but reserve humans for architecture, trust boundaries and abuse cases.
blog · bugbunny.ai
Secure Software Development Lifecycle: Building Security Into the Work
Building security into normal delivery: the SSDLC guide argues security decisions must land at design review, feature kickoff, PR and release time—not as a late gate once architecture is locked.
blog · bugbunny.ai
Secure Code Review: How to Find Boundary Failures Before Release
Secure code review as boundary hunting: trace attacker-controlled input to database, file, network, template and auth decisions, check authorization invariants, and cover workflow files and secrets.
blog · netspi.com
Three Threat Modeling Automation Conjectures
If you are buying or building threat modeling automation, here are three conjectures to take into consideration.
blog · netspi.com
Five Signs Your Application Security Assessment Process Needs a Reboot
NetSPI lists five signs of an overly manual application security assessment process, from email scoping to copy-paste reporting, arguing automation can cut administrative overhead by 40-60%.
blog · netspi.com
Performing Code Reviews to PCI Requirements
We were asked by a customer about performing code review based on the PCI requirements.
back