Innovation and Consistency: The Right and Left Brain of Vulnerability Management

NetSPI lists five signs of an overly manual application security assessment process, from email scoping to copy-paste reporting, arguing automation can cut administrative overhead by 40-60%.

NetSPI clarifies the difference between security orchestration and automation: scripts handle single tasks, while orchestration connects systems into a consistent vulnerability lifecycle process.

Citing CEO survey data and breach costs, NetSPI makes the case for PTaaS: continuous manual-plus-automated testing on a monthly or quarterly cadence instead of annual point-in-time penetration tests.

NetSPI explains how multiple scanners and ticketing systems create data silos that breed duplicate vulnerabilities and false positives, slowing remediation and eroding trust in security testing.

NetSPI outlines recurring vulnerability management challenges: vulnerability floods, fragmented scanner tracking, 12-day average remediation coordination losses, and compliance-driven blind spots.

NetSPI announces Resolve 7, evolving its pentesting platform into a web-based vulnerability management and orchestration service with RBAC, SSO, findings correlation, and automated reporting.